For twelve months I had a reading lamp on one nightstand and nothing on the other because I couldn't decide. The lamp was a beautiful brass arc style I'd had for years โ adjustable, generous with light, good for reading. But it took up nearly the entire surface of the nightstand and made the bed feel asymmetrical in a way I couldn't stop noticing.
The case for sconces is mostly about space and symmetry. They free the nightstand for what should be there โ a glass of water, a book, the phone you're trying not to look at. They look intentional in a way that a lamp on a table rarely does. And when done right, with bedroom wall sconces at the correct height, they provide genuinely good reading light.
The case for lamps is flexibility. You can move them, adjust them, replace them without touching a wall. If you have a swing-arm lamp, you can angle it exactly where you need it. And in a rented space, or a bedroom where you're still figuring out the layout, a lamp lets you change your mind.
My decision: sconces in the bedroom, lamp in the reading nook. The bedroom needed the clean look and the freed-up nightstand space. The reading nook โ an alcove with a window seat โ needed a floor lamp I could angle over my shoulder while sitting sideways, which no wall-mounted fixture could do as well.
Both are right. The mistake is assuming one answer works for every room. Think about how you actually use the space, what the surface situation is, and whether you're willing to commit. In our bedroom, I was ready to commit โ and finally having matching sconces on both sides felt like the room exhaled.
Karen at The Holloway Home covered the same question from a practical standpoint in her bedroom wall lamp versus table lamp comparison โ her criteria for making the choice are different from mine but worth reading.